Comparison of Single-Vacuum-Bag and Double-Vacuum-Bag Methods

PDF Publication Title:

Comparison of Single-Vacuum-Bag and Double-Vacuum-Bag Methods ( comparison-single-vacuum-bag-and-double-vacuum-bag-methods )

Previous Page View | Next Page View | Return to Search List

Text from PDF Page: 010

9 porosity and through-thickness void are reported when using DVB, i.e. 0.04 % and 0.5 %, respectively. These results are superior when compared to laminates produced using SVB technique which demonstrated the content of surface porosity and through-thickness void of 0.1 % and 0.7 %, respectively. The SVB technique holds the laminate tightly during the entire curing process, leaving minimal space for entrapped air to be evacuated, which results in the worse pitting effect. On the contrary to the SVB technique, the ballooning effect in DVB allows entrapped volatiles to be evacuated, resulting in a reduction of 69 % lower content of surface porosity and 36 % through-thickness void. These observations conclusively elucidate that the DVB technique is better in vigorously removing the entrapped volatiles so as to achieve a lower content of voids. It is observed that the increment of thickness in laminates further hinders the air evacuation process and worsens the void contents, as shown in Figure 7(b). Table 2: Surface porosity and through-thickness void content. Bagging Techniques SVB SVB SVB DVB DVB DVB Laminate Surface Thickness Porosity (%) (mm) 1.6 0.100 2.5 0.117 3.2 0.120 1.6 0.030 2.5 0.040 3.2 0.036 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Though- Thickness Void (%) 0.484 0.754 0.904 0.229 0.462 0.675 Samples 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Vacuum Bagging Techniques Surface Porosity (%) Through-Thickness Void (%) (a) 0 SVB DVB 1.6mm 2.5mm 3.2mm Vacuum Bagging Techniques Surface Porosity (%) Through-Thickness Void (%) (b) Figure 7: Surface porosity and through-thickness void in laminates produced using (a) various vacuum bagging techniques, and (b) various laminate thicknesses. The content of surface porosity is almost similar in all laminates with an average of 0.07 %. This similar pitting effect indicates that the evacuation process Void Content (%) Void Content (%)

PDF Image | Comparison of Single-Vacuum-Bag and Double-Vacuum-Bag Methods

PDF Search Title:

Comparison of Single-Vacuum-Bag and Double-Vacuum-Bag Methods

Original File Name Searched:

1912176.pdf

DIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing

5,000 BF Shipping Container Lumber Dry Kiln For Quality Lumber The 5,000 BF container kiln consists of one 40 foot high-cube aluminum shipping container... More Info

Shipping Container Lumber Dry Kilns by Global Energy Global Energy designed and developed the container kiln back in 1991. The purpose is to give access to portable sawmill owners, furniture makers, and small business the value added profit of dry kiln lumber and quality hardwoods... More Info

Vacuum Kiln Conversion Kit for Lumber and Wood Dry Kilns Convert your existing conventional dry kiln into a fast drying vacuum kiln. Similar to vacuum bagging in the boat building and aircraft industry, we have come up with a proprietary process which allows you to build a very simple vacuum kiln at a fraction of the price, and without the intensive conventional metal chamber structure... More Info

Vacuum Pump Cart System for Bagging Clamping Wood Drying and more Vacuum Cart with 2HP Pump and Dual Pistons with multiple multiplex vacuum ports and liquid reservoir... More Info

Vacuum Bagging Basics Vacuum bagging is a method of clamping, which has traditionally been used in the composites industry, but can also be used for vacuum drying materials, including wood products... More Info

CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@globalmicroturbine.com (Standard Web Page)